Since its adoption, the Fisheries Law of , (Ley de Pesca, , “Fisheries Law”) has been .. Decreto Nº /09 – Ley general de aguas. 77 | GRass wal, LEY NO 2 . 63 Bodie T T – Bridgeport M – – 09 CEDARVILLE . ост”виг | guг”L” | ид”эoz | 9ьс’иэ | л9″87 оy;”Ley | o67″8 “ct og7″L. 06? . 94 . оy gy С99 98 9 9 91 09 gaT уg9″g б66″1 02 ое | гдо”g 09
|Published (Last):||21 April 2013|
|PDF File Size:||4.2 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||6.97 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The witness has testified that Inspector Suresh Kumar directed SI Rakesh to conduct proceeding in this regard after which a raiding party was formed under the supervision of SI Rakesh to apprehend accused Sushil Sushi. The Assessor s map parcel number when used to describe property in this I. Contents of this issue. According to her, she received the PCR form copy of which is Ex. According to him, he does not remember whether he had stated that the clutch of his vehicle was out of order.
Defence Counsel for the accused Sushil, this witness has deposed that Inspector Jai Prakash took the accused outside the Court Room and interrogated him while sitting in the corridor. Sachin Prakash has also been examined St. There must be a chain of evidence so complete as not to leave any reasonable ground for the conclusion consistent with the innocence of the accused and must show leey in all human 181-009 the act must have been done by the accused.
The witness has denied the suggestion that he did not phone his Jija till the time police pursuit on him became hot or that Bhola did not take the impugned car from him on The witness has admitted that Bhola had given the RC and the motorcycle to him and has denied the suggestion that Sushil who had come with accused Bhola drove the aforesaid car from there and he had seen him while driving.
The various police witnesses have proved that the Alto Car had been recovered abandoned from the fields of village Jyonti and the members of the Crime Team have proved having lifted five chance prints from the said car and blood stains from the rear seat, music system and window of the said car, which rear seat shows positive result for human blood of Group ‘A’.
Chandigarh Criminal Appeal No. He has deposed that he had not stated in his statement to the police that he had identified the remaining three persons also while sitting in the police station whose name was told to him by the Investigating Officer as Sanjeev, Vishal and Vijay.
He has also correctly identified the case property i. Defence counsels and therefore, his testimony has gone uncontroverted.
He has further deposed that he visited the spot of recovery of dead body on the date when Ex. He has also deposed that he is not known to any any Rinku, resident of Khera Kalan, Delhi.
Santa Cruz Sentinel, Volume 106, Number 131, 4 June 1962 — Page 11
Given the background of the deceased Amjad who was a local criminal, it is not possible that his brother Mohd. He has also deposed that police officials came to him and he had given his statement to the police. MM which was fixed for He has further deposed that the case was registered upon his statement at Police Station Samaypur Badli after the le of dead body of his brother.
He is unable to tell as to who was the Driver of said Alto Car as the mirror of the car were of black colour and states that one of them was already sitting in the car and four accused persons entered in the car along with his brother in his presence. He has further deposed that one sandal was recovered St. He has admitted that the inquest papers were deposited in mortuary BJRM at 4: Link MM for further 181-099 and he filed the said Kalandra in the court of Sh.
P6 and that the marks on the desi katta, deformed bullet, the test fired cartridge and unused cartridges have been put by him and has voluntarily added that the parcel numbers have been mentioned by a Marker for purposes of identification.
He has denied the suggestion that he had stated to the Investigating Officer that one of the two boys who came on the motorcycle was known to him or that he was not giving 1811-09 fact deliberately to favour the accused persons. Ownership of Alto Car bearing No. He has admitted that there is no railway line shown in Ex.
Pr”‘ S-5 – — H98 23 raYii icn. According to the witness, he did not recollect how many times Sachin must have called on his father’s mobile and has voluntarily stated that he thought he had not even called on the said mobile. PW31 Rajan has deposed that the son of his Bua namely Vishal had informed him that Amjad was killed by some person and on It is also alleged that after committed the murder of Amjad all the accused in furtherance of their common intention threw the dead body of Amjad in a well in the fields on the way from village Khera Kalan to village Holambi Kalan with an intent St.
Ismail saw the accused Bhola and his four other associates taking his brother Amjad. He has further deposed that he was not informed nor did he inquire as to who had got FIR No.
P7 and two live cartridges which are collectively Ex. ET UX Parcel 8 Surender reached the spot where he and his team inspected the spot and they remained at the spot from 11 AM to He has also deposed that he had seen the accused Sanjeev Bava at the spot on that day and thereafter he had seen lye in the Court.
According to the witness he did not make any telephone call on EB1 and Parcel no. This witness has admitted that Sachin had informed him that Bhola along with Sunil had taken his aforesaid vehicle and that on He has further deposed that the original kalandara prepared by the Crime Branch was handed over to him by the Court.
Vipin Kumar and thereafter, on He has further deposed that he made inquiries from the nearby houses in the same block to ascertain the sources of the call but no source could come at that time. He has denied that accused Sanjeev Bawa was not present among the ,ey accused persons who were present in the Court on the day of kidnapping. According to the witness, Insp.