Runceanu Sabin studies Moldova, Philosophical Counseling, and Migration History. IOAN DAMASCHIN more. by Mircea Ramurean Ioan – Istoria bisericeasca universalamore. by Mircea Dogmatica Sf. silvestru de Canev vol 5more. by Mircea. 1 SF. IOAN GURĂ DE AUR, Scrieri – partea întâi. Omilii la Facere (I), in vol. 2 SF. IOAN DAMASCHIN, Dogmatica, translated by Pr. Dumitru Fecioru, Editura.
|Published (Last):||19 August 2016|
|PDF File Size:||6.19 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||15.49 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
And it is, as demonstrated by St Maximus the Confessor see postings by oiftime on this thread. This is NOT admitting two natures after the union. Namely a that Dioscorus of Alexandria has not been desposed for dogmatic reasonsas Anatolius of Constantinople has declaredb that the exclamations of the bishopsby which they anathematised Dioscorus,do not constitute a decision of the Synod ,c that the Robber Synod held by Dioscorus in of Ephesus was not recognised as heretical by the Fathers of Chalcedon ,d that Dioscorus and Severus of Antioch havein their writings ,rejected verbatim the confusionblending and mixture of the natures of Christ.
Clearly you know nothing about St. May the Lord have mercy on those who bear false witness against anyone. I know about the so-called missunderstandings, St. And the Sever formula is a missinterpretation of the orthodox Dogma that lead Sever to heresy, and he is out of the Church. He is word-for-word the theology of St. The next generation of Orthodox will read this and those with simple minds will see nothing but Pharisees debate each other danaschin terminological differences.
Maximus the Confessor developed an unprecedented line of argumentation by which he makes clear the heretical character of the Severian Chritology.
Dumitru Staniloae si pr. For as regards the statements in which he seemed to accuse the most blessed Cyril by speaking ill of him, he made a correct profession in his final statements and rebutted those in which he had accused him.
Mircea Mihai Dorinel | Universitatea din Craiova –
Damzschin Cyril wrote before Chalcedon. No matter what you tell the Pharisees, they will never believe in dog,atica faith in Christ. C The exclamations of the bishopsby which they anathematised Dioscorusexpressed the Catholic mindset of the Churchsince all of Fathers expreesed themselves in onenness of heart not just a few or even many bishops. It has neither been reduced nor stolen away, as they say.
Nu exista mantuire pentru cel ce cunoaste adevarul, dar il ignora pentru a pazi niste porunci omenesti, ma refer la una dintre ele,adica ziua soarelui.
I am confident ioann church fathers were justified in their condemnation while maintaining an Orthodox Christology consistent with St. And similarly of many other things.
Uso de cookies
Intreruperea comuniunii cu ecumenistii 4 out of 5 dentists recommend this WordPress. Who took to Himself a perfect manhood. That is incredible coming from you! Nestorianism was thoroughly rejected damascnin Chalcedon. Vedeti, la parte asta ma refeream,la ceea ce El a dorit sa vada in vietile noastre. He is unable to prove to you any heresy he or Severus taught, because he knows very well they are Orthodox. Dogmatca Karmiris and Father John Romanidis regarding the orthodoxy of the Anti-Chalcedonians were a result of an early enthusiasm which soon thereafter gave way to positions of serious questions and much deliberation.
The Orthodox Church is worth more than betting on it. But we cannot defer from damaaschin the truth, just because some disagree. It made assertions that some of the arguments made were unfounded.
BTW, you have been drifting from one position to another since this thread began. Dioscorus the most devout bishop of Alexandria said: Inainte de a porni la discutie ar trebui fiecare sa-si raspunda sincer la o intrebare: Domnule administrator, v-ati intalnit vreodata cu acest Dumnezeu?
FORUMUL ORTODOX – TEOLOGIE.NET
Whether or not that was sincere is of a different story. Severus stayed true to that. If that is what Fr. Your tradition actually criticized the theology of St.
Again, your interpretation of St. The Robber Council approved of Eutyches and proclaimed one nature after union, which is heretical. Interviu cu parintele Athanasios Henein, fost preot copt monofisit convertit la Ortodoxie. They date from Dioscorus, Severus and their early followers. The flesh is flesh and not Godhead, even though it became the flesh of God; and similarly the Word is God and not flesh even if he made the flesh his very own in the economy.
He thinks he knows theology, but continues to teach rubbish. Speaking of logic — at EphesusEutyches was condemned while accepting Ephesus which approved Eutyches.
Metropolitan Bishoy, may God soften his heart, is a Coptic Metropolitan who is a stubborn man, a man who is filled with hatred, and deals with situations by suspending haphazardly without proper investigation. After the union has occurred, however, we do not divide the natures from one another, nor do we sever the one and indivisible into two sons, but we say that there is One Son, and as the holy Fathers have stated: These are quite different things and they are not consubstantial with each other, yet when they are united they constitute the single nature of man, even though the difference in nature of the things that are brought into unity is still present within the system of the composition.
They also said the following: John the Damascene ascribes these terms to their Christologyhe is acting as Prof. Anatolius the most devout bishop of Constantinople Rome said: Este insuflata de Dumnezeu.