structure with responsibilities pdf. 3 – Risk assessments Working with the standards and Good practice is one of the three approaches along with if necessary. Source: Assessment – a brief guide to controlling risk in the workplace. Available at: http:// (accessed ).
| Author: | Meztigore Mikabei |
| Country: | Sierra Leone |
| Language: | English (Spanish) |
| Genre: | Personal Growth |
| Published (Last): | 15 January 2013 |
| Pages: | 389 |
| PDF File Size: | 9.75 Mb |
| ePub File Size: | 16.48 Mb |
| ISBN: | 551-3-92847-987-9 |
| Downloads: | 44171 |
| Price: | Free* [*Free Regsitration Required] |
| Uploader: | Malakazahn |
This accident was completely avoidable as a suitable and effective risk assessment would have identified corrosion as a hazard and a suitable maintenance regime, as the risk mitigation, would have prevented the LPG leak. These tethers and pegs obviously failed to hold the structure in place.
These are outlined in Fig. The Health and Safety at Work Act places responsibility not only on employers but also on designers, manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that articles and substances are safe for use so far as is reasonably practicable, and on every employee while at work to take reasonable care of him or herself, and of any other person who may be affected by his or her actions.
The reason for placing the responsibility with the organisation creating the risk is that it is impossible for HSE to um expert in the operation of every technology and workplace, especially at the rate of technology development. All three of the parties listed above had a responsibility to ensure the structure was safe but not one of them did so.
How the risk is managed is to be determined by those who create the risk. In this case, the employer forgot Step 5 of HSE’s Five Step Risk Assessment Process, that is ‘to continually review and update the risk assessment at suitable time intervals’. This flexibility is a great advantage but it requires judge ment too. The structure lifted up to a near vertical position, ‘like a sail’, as shown in Fig.
This occurred while members of the public were inside the structure and others were surrounding the structure as it fell back to earth. What could go wrong?
HSE – Publications: Free Leaflets – Risk Assessment
The legal responsibilities of employers[ 4 ]. What harm could be caused to plant, people employees and the public and the environ ment land, water, air, plants, animals.
The risk assessment team should be multi-disciplinary including, for example, those who work in the area being assessed, a manager, a health inrg163 safety specialist and a wqw who is not closely associated with the work area. What new actions are required to further reduce the risk? HSE successfully prosecuted all parties, the Designer, the Contract Company and the Public Park Authority, for failing to protect the health and safety of both workers and the public.
The investigation identified that fuel leaked out of a coupling during the in-flight refuelling. This aww illustrated in Fig. HSL undertook an investigation and determined that the structure was tethered by 22 ropes and pegs distributed around the perimeter of the structure.
In addition, individuals may be imprisoned if held personally liable.
Team B, once they have completed initial fabrication pass to Team C for finishing. Consider for example a small manufacturing process where Team A take raw material and prepare it for initial fabrication by Team B.
The Legal responsibilities of Employers.
Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice
These modifications made the aircraft unsafe, but this wasn’t identified. The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. Identify the Hazards associated with the plant equipmentpeople and processes.
In addition, only 22 tethers were located after the incident.
Risk Assessment in the UK Health and Safety System: Theory and Practice
The Risk Graph of Fig. The legal responsibilities of employers are summarised in Fig. The structure was designed for its artistic merit and the focus of the Designer was on the dream-like experience that participants would enjoy. Had these calculations determined the type strengthnumber and positioning of tethers and pegs?
Risk assessment
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License http: It comprised inflatable ‘cells’, each 5m high. However, the focus of the group’s risk assessment was event management in terms of crowd management, people flow through the structure hsd. The Contract Company did not require the Designer to supply a suitable specification containing the loading calculations to inform the location of the tethers.
National Center for Biotechnology InformationU. The Nimrod aircraft, shown in Fig.
Common Pitfalls of Risk Assessment and How to Improve The case studies illustrate some of the common failing in undertaking risk assessments. Identify the new controls that are needed, who will take responsibility for putting them in place and by when. To undertake a suitable and sufficient risk htyp takes time and an appropriate multi-disciplinary team of people. Of employees to ensure that they do not endanger themselves or anyone else who may be affected by their work.
,445,291,400,400,arial,12,4,0,0,5_SCLZZZZZZZ_.jpg "john milnor topology from the differentiable viewpoint")