Taguchi recomienda el uso de arreglos ortogonales para hacer matrices que contengan los controles y los factores de ruido en el diseño de experimentos. Taguchi method with Orthogonal Arrays reducing the sample size from. , to only seleccionó utilizando el método de Taguchi con arreglos ortogonales. Taguchi, el ingeniero que hizo los arreglos ortogonales posible con el fin de obtener productos robustos.

Author: Gakus Shaktilmaran
Country: Niger
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Business
Published (Last): 5 January 2009
Pages: 270
PDF File Size: 14.86 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.46 Mb
ISBN: 216-2-51068-144-7
Downloads: 60911
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Munos

Medium and low impact factors alone diagnose no Autism; see Table 6 rows 2 and 3. Faced with the challenge of characterizing or measuring symptoms and locate a patient at a functioning level, the ADOS -G has the advantage, with its variety ortoogonales tasks, to make a diagnosis on observational basis.

The objective of the instrument is not to evaluate knowledge abilities in the subject but rather to evaluate if the subject wants to participate in a social exchange [19]. Another validation form is the hold out validation, which avoids the overlapping of train data and validation data, the available data is held out during training yaguchi used only for validation purpose.

The algorithm for this tool evaluates 12 items with 3 possible states. The error is define as the quadratic error E p at the output units for pattern p between the desired output and the real output. This is the reason why they are called high impact factors. Juan N Navarro, The big difference between both works is that they used individuals to train the ADT while the methodology here presented used only 27 cases using the Taguchi method to select the training data.


Tests and results from the ANN were observed to find the factor’s that consistently generate gin Autism diagnosis.

Kanner, “Autistic disturbances of affective contact”, Nervous fe, vol 2. The 12 inputs, which are the same 12 items that the ADOS-G algorithm evaluates, can have values of 0, 1 or 2.

ADOS-G possible scores are 0, 1,2,3,7 and 8.

Genichi Taguchi by Alfonso Armendariz on Prezi

Weights have to be trained and many neurons can perform their tasks at the same time parallel processing [20]. Learning can be supervised, where both arrwglos and desired outputs are well known and the ANN must infer the input-output relationship.

Applying the chain rule. This classification was compared to the work done by [28]. This algorithm evaluation is shown as the last column in Table 4. Diagnosis is achieved by behavioral evaluations specifically designed to identify and measure the presence and severity of the disorder.

Module 1 is used for toddlers that do not use language to communicate. Observation of the orthogonal array was needed to find the factors that consistently generate an ASD diagnosis.

It ortogonalew be observed in Table 6 first row, that the factors classified as high A2, B5 and B9 when assigned a value of 2 and zero for the rest, provide an output of 0. The activation function is a sigmoid or “S” shaped function because it is bounded and always has a continuous derivative.

The population used to train the system consisted of individuals with autism and 15 individual without autism, cases were used to verify it reaching an accuracy of Where w jk ortogonaes the weighting factor for input j and output k.

And through the development of tasks it manages to make a representation of deficits and the level of impairment of the patient.


Increasing the number of hidden neurons can prevent from falling in a local minimum and diminish the error, but it might consist of a long training process [23]. From a total of 29 items, the evaluation algorithm only takes into account 12 items, 5 items that evaluate the child’s ability to communicate which are: Table 5 Once the ANN was trained and validated, the following step was to classify the 12 factors through their impact on diagnosis.

Where m is the number arregpos factors and L is the number of levels for each factor or the possible values each factor can have.

Evaluación de la Robustez del sistema Mahalanobis-Taguchi a diferentes Arreglos Factoriales.

Since the OA shown in Table 3 considers the states 1, 2 and 3 and the ADOS-G algorithm consists of three states 0, 1 and 2, Table 4 was created as the combination of cases that was used to train the ANN containing the items evaluated with the possible states. The questionnaire is answered by the children’s parents.

No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Mayra Reyes Calle del PuenteCol. For this, different levels of fractional factorial design 29 were used, as well as all possible fractions for each level to find out if the results varied depending on the array utilized. The problem with this type of validation is that the results are highly dependent on the choice of the training data [33].