). Altought most of brazilian beef production comes from grazing systems, ), representing almost 10% of the slaughters in Brazil (ANUALPEC, ). Description. You can download anualpec on the site When compared with finishing on pastures, feedlot is very little expressive in Brazil. ). It accounted for the largest bovine herd in the country in . accounts for % of calves produced in Brazil (ANUALPEC ).
|Published (Last):||2 May 2017|
|PDF File Size:||7.1 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||17.75 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Author links open overlay panel Mateus J the surplus is destined for export Anualpec, Further studies evaluating feedlot finishing have also demonstrated the low relevance of fixed costs, and showed that two items of variable costs were the most representative in relation to the total cost: American Economic Review Analyzing the NPV 0211 slaughter weights considering the correlation amongst the input variables Table 4there is a negative mean, median and mode for kg, while for the weights of and kg, mean, median, mode and SD were more favorable.
201 practice, the sensitivity analysis presented in this study demonstrates the importance of technical efficiency in the management of feedlots as an alternative for finishing beef cattle, having a direct impact on the economic response. When compared with finishing on pastures, feedlot is very little expressive in Brazil seven to eight percent of total anaulpec -Anualpec,although technically well mastered, both from the nutritional as well as the management point of view.
This fact does not correspond to the negative value of the mean of NPV for this slaughter weight. Assessing the risk of beef cattle feedlot, Resende Filho et al. South-Western College Pub, Ohio. The risk analysis showed that kg slaughter weight anualpex the lowest risk for finishing cattle in feedlots when compared with and kg.
Metodologia de custo utilizada pelo IEA. In the simulation of NPV output variableLatin Hypercube type of sampling, with Mersenne Twister type of random number generator, was used to simulate 2, interactions Palisade, In this case, the Kolmogorov-Smirnov asymptotic test represents a very efficient statistical feature for validating the difference between pairs of curves, in which the slaughter weight of kg dominated the kg when input variables correlations where considered or disregarded.
Details about the items that comprise the costs of making silage can be found in Pacheco et al. The most important variables influencing the NVP are the prices of feeder and finished steers, initial and final weights, concentrate and roughage costs, and minimum rate of attractiveness; therefore, farmers should pay particular attention to these variables when making the decision of whether or not to use feedlot to finish beef cattle.
A snapshot of management practices and nutritional recommendations used by feedlot nutritionists in Brazil. Revenues from milk sales were calculated by including bonuses and penalties to the milk base price US0.
Among slaughter weights, considering or disregarding the input variables correlation, the skewness and kurtosis were not adequate indicators for decision making, in which the slaughter weight of kg, for example, would be the best investment option indicating a tail closer to the right side of the mean skewness and more acute curve shape kurtosis.
For the comparison of cumulative probability distributions of simulated NPV, the stochastic dominance of first and second order criterion was used Hadar and Russel, ; Anderson et al. Economic feasibility studies of beef cattle feedlot Resende Filho anuaalpec al. Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits.
Agriculture In Brazil Yearbook Depreciation of infra-structure, machinery, implements and equipment were calculated for a planning horizon of one year. Material and Methods Information of animal performance and experimental diet roughage and concentrate was used in the calculations of production costs as well as in the simulation of financial indicator.
All costs were estimated per animal. Results In interpreting the financial indicator NPV, zero or greater values indicate that the initial investment is fully recovered at a given discounted rate. Increases in feeding time in feedlots Restle et al.
Anualpec 2011 download
Gross revenues consisted of the sale of the finished animal. The intended slaughter weights wereand kg, and the actual slaughter weights wereand kg, respectively. Conclusions The use of input variables correlation improves the estimates of the output variable, Net Present Value, producing more consistent results than simulations that disregard such relationship amongst variables.
Discussion The interpretation of the statistics of the simulated NPV Table 3 is of great value in decision making; regardless of whether or not the correlation is used, feeding animals to reach kg proved to be the worst investment option among the three slaughter weights evaluated.
In the criterion of stochastic dominance of first order, investments for investors who prefer higher returns are selected; in the stochastic dominance of second order, selected investments for investors who prefer high returns and low risk are selected.
The risk analysis was complemented by a sensitivity analysis, using the Stepwise Multivariate regression method Palisade, to identify and rank the cost items input variables with major influence on the NPV. To estimate the NPV, cash flows were developed within a planning horizon of one year, as suggested in Resende Filho et al.
Thus, the advantage of using the correlation between input variables aiming to simulate the variable output is evident, obtaining more accurate estimate of the degree of risk associated with the investment. Mun and Albright et al. Considering feedlot-finishing a technology of high investment, Lopes et al.
Data analysis and decision making. This indicates the need for careful evaluations in order to define the best slaughter weight of animals confined in Brazilian conditions. In simulation analysis, anialpec of the benefits of using the probability distribution is to facilitate the interpretation of risk, allowing decision makers to choose more safely whether or not to invest in projects.
The authors argued that the increased risk in finishing systems is due to the behavior of the fixed and variable costs.
Anualpec 2011 pdf
All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License. Although no studies evaluating the risk of feedlotfinishing cattle with different weights were found, there is evidence that fattening may involve higher risks than other stages of the production system. Moreover, small changes in beef price, feeder cattle purchase price and cost of the diet roughage and concentrate may define the economic viability of this finishing system, regardless of animal slaughter weight.
The same may also apply to the extra N 2 O emissions resulting from N fertilizer additions and those emissions related to O Anualpec online, te d acesso s principais atualizaes estatsticas do mercado pecurio de forma rpida e simples facilitando suas consultas e tomadas de decises.
This procedure generated standardized regression coefficients Anualpc,removing the influence snualpec the units and anualpfc all parameters at the same level.
Information of animal performance and experimental diet roughage and concentrate was used in the calculations of production costs as well as in the simulation of financial indicator.